> But... zan... that was GOOD poetry...
(author's view and reader's view differ, but thank you all the same)
> Two words: Bethphel's Diary.
Well, there are always exceptions...and now that I think about it, that rather special one does leap to mind. Sorry Leo, zan was generalising again - bad zan, bad zan!
> Well, more than two, actually. One of my favorite authors (Chuck
> Palanhiuk) constantly writes in first person, and many wonderful novels
> are written in 1st, too. So it really depends on how you're working, I
> guess.
Didn't make myself clear, sorry. My point was more that it takes talent and discipline to keep a first person persepctive - maintaining the right voice and tone, etc. For skilled writers, it's a powerful tool, just not for me.
> Yeah, but there are many ways of telling a story, and I like locking
> myself away in a character's head.
Oh, it's definitely a blast, but it wears you out, and it doesn't make for great action sequences
> Actually, third person isn't really
> all that different, when used in limited form instead of omniscient. I
> know when I used to write 3rd all the time, it was almost as introspective
> as my 1st. I guess I'm just an introspective person.
I suppose writing third person from one viewpoint would offer a similar effect (if slightly less so). But I need more practice at this, because at the moment I end up head-hopping like a headlouse The omnipresent narrator thing...that's a different prospect entirely.